Thread:Cbird2796/@comment-4073118-20130717181509/@comment-1667933-20130719223408

Luxionmk2 wrote: I haven't fought the "new versions" of the units, but the ones I've fought (in the Heartland for example) are just Rank 1 Imperial Units.

The "Madman" is technically a "Rogue Radio Tech", which has his own entry in the game files, and thus deserves its own unit page (and perhaps an NPC page/article for "Madman" if he ever gets his own portrait and lines of text).

My policy is this: if they have their own game tag in the game files, then they deserve their own article. If their "name" shares the same space as an existing unit, we append "(enemy)" to the name. Player units have priority in naming. If it's too confusing, then we create a disambiguation article.

In the case of the "Tank Killer", since it has its own game tag, "veh_tankdestroyer_rebel", complete with its own stats, it gets its own article. However, because its official name is "Tank Killer", the article page should be "Tank Killer (enemy)". I would drift away from being more specific than "enemy". The main article can make a note or reference to the enemy-version at the top, sort of like how wikipedia does it. That's exactly how I feel. I couldn't have said it better myself.